Vašington -- Uoči pete godišnjice terorističkog napada na Njujork i Vašington, vlada SAD nastoji da argumentima potisne teorije zavere.


Po rezultatima ankete koju je jula sproveo Univerzitet Skrips Hauard iz Ohaja, SAD, više od trećine Amerikanaca pretpostavlja da su zvaničnici SAD pomogli napade u kojima je poginulo gotovo 3.000 ljudi, ili da ih bar nisu sprečili kako bi SAD potom mogle da zarate u Avganistanu, a 2003. i u Iraku.

Stejt dipartment je ove nedelje demantovao teorije o zaveri pri napadu na Svetski trgovinski centar u Njujorku 11. septembra 2001.

Stejt dipartment je na svom sajtu na Internetu naveo neke od glavnih teorija zavere među kojima prednjači tvrdnja da se par oblakodera u Njujorku nije srušio od udara dva putnička aviona u njih, nego od tajno podmetnutog eksploziva.

"Rušenje tako može izgledati onima koji nisu stručni, ali eksperti za rušenje to vide sasvim drugačije", piše na sajtu.

Tu se ukazuje da stručnjaci za rušenje miniraju niže spratove zgrada, dok je Svetski trgovinski centar počeo da se ruši od gornjih spratova, u koje su udarila dva oteta "boinga 767" (Boeing).

Odgovarajući na dezinformacije u javnosti i sredstvima informisanja, Stejt dipartment nudi na jednom mestu "korektivne informacije" sabrane iz niza izvora i inače dostupnih javnosti, izjavila je predstavnik vlade Džoan Mur.

I Državni institut SAD za standarde i tehnologiju (NIST) postavio je u sredu "listu činjenica" na svoj Internet-sajt gde u obliku odgovora na pitanja analizira teorije o uzroku požara i rušenja Svetskog trgovinskog centra.

NIST posle trogodišnje istrage ukazuje da su se oblakoderi srušili zato što su u njih udarili avioni čiji su rezervoari bili puni goriva.

U tako izazvanom požaru temperatura je dostigla hiljadu stepeni Celzijusa zbog čega su se iskrivili metalni stubovi-nosači oblakodera, te su se zgrade potom srušile. Analiza čiji je to zaključak, ukazuje NIST, ima 43 toma i objavljena je oktobra 2005.

NIST koji pripada Ministarstvu trgovine SAD je "grupa vladinih naučnika pod upravom onih koje je postavio predsednik SAD Džordž Buš, te i nije verovatno da bi se njihov izveštaj razlikovao od zvanaične priče", izjavio je Kevin Rajan, urednik Internet-časopisa o napadu od 9. septembra 2001.

Rajan, bivši urednik Internet-sajta nezavisne organizacije za testiranje bezbednosti proizvoda "Underwriters Laboratories", izjavio je o obimnoj analizi napada iz 2001. koju pominje NIST: "Što smo više informacija saznavali iz te analize, bili smo sve zabrinutiji".


3. septembar 2006. Izvor: Beta, Rojters

Čemu argumenti da bi se pobilo nešto što nije istina?

p.s. Majku im jebem fašističku!

Fury as academics claim 9/11 was 'inside job'
by JAYA NARAIN

The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an "inside job", according to a group of leading academics.
Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries.

See also...
• New DNA bid to identify 9/11 victims
• Flight 93 'was shot down' claims book
• Iran's president keeps promise to purge universities of 'liberals'

The claims have caused outrage and anger in the US which marks the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday.
But leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated.

Professor Steven Jones, who lectures in physics at the Brigham Young University in Utah, says the official version of events is the biggest and most evil cover up in history.

He has joined the 9/11 Scholars for Truth whose membership includes up to 75 leading scientists and experts from universities across the US.
Prof Jones said: "We don't believe that 19 hijackers and a few others in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone.

"We challenge this official conspiracy theory and, by God, we're going to get to the bottom of this."
In essays and journals, the scientists are giving credence to many of the conspiracy theories that have circulated on the internet in the past five years.

They believe a group of US neo-conservatives called the Project for a New American Century, set on US world dominance, orchestrated the 9/11 attacks as an excuse to hit Iraq, Afghanistan and later Iran.
The group says scientific evidence over the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon is conclusive proof.

Professor Jones said it was impossible for the twin towers to have collapsed in the way they did from the collision of two aeroplanes.
He maintains jet fuel does not burn at temperatures high enough to melt steel beams and claims horizontal puffs of smoke seen during the collapse of the towers are indicative of controlled explosions used to bring down the towers.

The group also maintains World Trade Centre 7 - a neighbouring building which caught fire and collapsed later in the day - was only partially damaged but had to be destroyed because it housed a clandestine CIA station.

Professor James Fetzer, 65, a retired philosopher of science at the University of Minnesota, said: "The evidence is so overwhelming, but most Americans don't have time to take a look at this."

The 9/11 Commission dismissed the numerous conspiracy theories after its exhaustive investigation into the terror attacks.
Subsequent examinations of the towers' structure have sought to prove they were significantly weakened by the impact which tore off fire retardant materials and led the steel beams bending under heat and then collapsing.

Christopher Pyle, professor of constitutional law at Mt Holyoake College in Massachusetts, has dismissed the academic group.

He said: "To plant bombs in three buildings with enough bomb materials and wiring? It's too huge a project and would require far too many people to keep it a secret afterwards.

"After every major crisis, like the assassinations of JFK or Martin Luther King, we've had conspiracy theorists who come up with plausible scenarios for gullible people. It's a waste of time."

But University of Wisconsin assistant professor, Kevin Barrett, said experts are unwilling to believe theories which don't fit into their belief systems.

He said: "People will disregard evidence it if causes their faith to be shattered. I think we were all shocked. And then, when the voice of authority told us what happened, we just believed it."
As the fifth anniversary approached, the 9/11 Scholars for Truth is urging Congress to reopen the investigation claiming they have amassed a wealth of scientific evidence to prove their version of the terror attacks.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... ge_id=1770


-

ah ti prokleti komunisti!!!!!